Legal Opinion
James D. Minch and Richard A. Graf v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 14, 2007No. 05-2702PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
More than two years after the City of Chicago (the “City” or “Chicago”) agreed to discipline and discharge its firefighters solely for cause, the City adopted a Mandatory Retirement Ordinance (“MRO”) compelling firefighters to retire at age 63. Two of the firefighters who were forced to retire under the MRO filed suit on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, contending that mandatory retirement amounted to age discrimination prohibited by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) as well as a deprivation of procedural due process. We concluded in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Bielanski v. County of KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Sharp Electronics Corp. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Evers v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Khan v. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Domka v. Portage County, Wis.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.