Catawba Memorial Hospital v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
The parties raise numerous issues by this appeal. We find three to be dispositive and, in view of our decisions with respect thereto, conclude that it is unnecessary to address the remainder. For the reasons set forth herein, the decision below is reversed in part and affirmed in part.
Respondents’ Appeal
By their first assignment of error, respondents contend that the superior court erred by reversing the Agency’s denial of Catawba’s request for a declaratory ruling. Declaratory rulings under the Administrative Procedure Act are governed by G.S. § 150B-4, which provides in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. BrutonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Equity Solutions of the Carolinas, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of State TreasurerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- In Re Nuckles v. Wake Forest Fire DepartmentNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996
- Intersal, Inc. v. HamiltonNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017
- LDI Shallotte 179 Holdings, LLC v. State of N.C. Dep't of Envtl. QualityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.