Legal Opinion
General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Concepts
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 12, 2003No. C7-03-256PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
On appeal from summary judgment, appellant contends that (1) respondent Joe Ebertz was not an “insured” under a commercial automobile policy issued to “Outdoor Concepts Joe Ebertz DBA”; and (2) Ebertz made an election within the meaning of MinmStat. § 65B.49, subd. 3a(5) (2002), and is precluded from recovering Personal Injury Protection or Underin-sured Motorist benefits under his commercial policy or from otherwise stacking coverage.
FACTS
On August 25, 2001, respondent Joe Ebertz was riding his bicycle on a country road north of his home in Hudson, Wisconsin, when he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Pro MacHineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance v. Roger SchwiegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Loos Ex Rel. LoosDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. Teamcorp., Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.