Legal Opinion

Haloro, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 9, 1961No. 15669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBER K. MILLER, Chief Judge.

Frank K. Lower and Thomas R. Hatz, Jr., applied January 22, 1946, for a patent on a spun glass roofing mop. In the protracted proceedings in the Patent Office, the examiner’s rejection of all pertinent claims was affirmed by the Patent Office Board of Appeals. The applicants then sued for and obtained, under R.S. § 4915, * a judgment author izing the issuance of a patent. Pursuant thereto, on March 16, 1954, the Commissioner of Patents issued Letters Patent No. 2,671,922 to the appellant as assignee of the applicants.

On April 25, 1955, Haloro, Inc., sued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Icyclair, Inc. v. National Popsicle Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  5. Haloro, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fibreglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffith Rubber Mills, a Corporation v. Henry S. HoffarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp. v. Anglo-American Clays Corp.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API