Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp. v. Anglo-American Clays Corp.
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
OWENS, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff, an assignee of United States Patent Number 3,586,523 (copy reproduced as an Appendix to this opinion), commenced the instant action seeking injunctive relief and damages due to defendants’ alleged infringements of the patent in suit. The defendants assert that the patent is invalid, and counterclaim for attorney fees incurred to prove invalidity. The issue of patent validity was tried separately before this court on September 7 through 22, 1983. This constitutes this court’s findings of fact and conclusion of law as to the issue of patent validity.
INTRODUCTION
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rohm and Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- The Dunlop Company, Limited, and Cross-Appellee v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Friction Division Products, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988