Legal Opinion

Haloro, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fibreglas Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 14, 1959No. 14730_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal is from a judgment of the District Court in favor of the defendant company following a trial upon the merits of an action for infringement of a patent for a spun glass roofing mop. 1 The court held that the patent, which the court had authorized to be granted to plaintiff’s assignors in earlier R.S. 4915 proceedings, 2 was unenforceable because the patent had been procured by the fraud and inequitable conduct of plaintiff’s assignors in those proceedings. The bases of the finding of fraud and inequitable conduct were representations and testimony as to the universal adoption and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Alvin M. Marks v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  5. Oliver United Filters, Inc. v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Haloro, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  3. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API