Legal Opinion
United States v. DiPasquale
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 31, 1984No. Nos. 83-1364, 83-1365, 83-1367 to 83-1369 and 83-1449PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
The six appellants were convicted and sentenced on one count of conspiracy to collect “claimed debts” by extortionate means in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894(a). Five of the six were convicted and sentenced on various counts of the underlying substantive offense, also in violation of section 894(a). We have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
I. FACTS
We adopt the district court’s comprehensive and detailed narration of the facts, see *1285United, States v. DiPasquale, 561 F.Supp. 1338, 1341-46 (E.D.Pa.1983). An abridgment of the district court’s…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- UNITED STATES of America v. Darus H. ZEHRBACH, Appellant in No. 93-7477. Alex A. Mervis, Appellant in No. 93-7493Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.