Ellingsworth v. Swiggum
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
Frederick and Susan Swiggum appeal from a declaratory judgment permitting William and Helen Ellingsworth to replace a pier at the end of the Ellingsworths' easement on a riparian lot owned by the Swiggums. The Swiggums had removed the pier. After a trial to the court, the court concluded that the Ellingsworths, as non-riparian owners, were permitted to maintain the pier under § 30.131, STATS., and so had the right to replace the pier. We conclude that § 30.131 does not give the Ellingsworths the right to maintain or replace the pier, and therefore we reverse.
The relevant facts are not in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Stoesser v. Shore Drive PartnershipWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Godfrey Co. v. LopardoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sterlingworth Condominium Ass'n v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- State v. BeiersdorfCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Konneker v. RomanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- ABKA Ltd. Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- ABKA Ltd. Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.