Legal Opinion

Ellingsworth v. Swiggum

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 1, 1995No. 94-1812PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

Frederick and Susan Swiggum appeal from a declaratory judgment permitting William and Helen Ellingsworth to replace a pier at the end of the Ellingsworths' easement on a riparian lot owned by the Swiggums. The Swiggums had removed the pier. After a trial to the court, the court concluded that the Ellingsworths, as non-riparian owners, were permitted to maintain the pier under § 30.131, STATS., and so had the right to replace the pier. We conclude that § 30.131 does not give the Ellingsworths the right to maintain or replace the pier, and therefore we reverse.

The relevant facts are not in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Stoesser v. Shore Drive PartnershipWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Godfrey Co. v. LopardoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sterlingworth Condominium Ass'n v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  2. State v. BeiersdorfCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  3. Konneker v. RomanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. ABKA Ltd. Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. ABKA Ltd. Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API