Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Nassar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1936No. Docket No. 16, Calendar No. 38,655PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff had judgment against both defendants for injuries sustained in a collision between his own and Nassar’s automobile.

State trunk line highway M-71 runs two miles north of Durand and turns west two miles to Vernon. From the intersection at the turn a county road runs north and a township road east. The cars collided at the intersection.

Defendants contend plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. He testified that as he came north he saw Nassar approaching from the west and watched him; it was a dark night; he saw Nassar’s lights but could not judge his speed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Pyyny v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Harrington v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McDonald v. DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  2. Brown v. Standard Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Campbell v. OsterlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Holgate v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Rathburn v. RiedelMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API