Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Marshall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1987No. C-4809PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILGARLIN, Justice.

We granted writ in this case principally to consider whether a cause of action exists against an insurance carrier under Tex.Ins. Code Ann. art. 21.21 (unfair insurance practices) when that carrier fails to comply with the terms of a worker’s compensation com*771promise settlement agreement. Of additional concern at the time we granted writ was whether an insurance carrier owes a duty of good faith and fair dealing to the compensation claimant in complying with the terms of the settlement agreement.

Based on jury findings that Aetna Casualty and Surety Company had represented to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Bar Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Crown Life Insurance Company v. CasteelTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. MayfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. RuttigerTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Vail v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API