Legal Opinion
ICE CORPORATION v. Armco Steel Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 9, 1966No. 3. “21. Electrotechnics * * *PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory judgment that United States Patent No. 2,-837,626 issued on June 3, 1958 (“the Buck patent”) is either invalid or not infringed by the operation and production of certain welding machines made and sold by plaintiffs. 1
The patent in suit relates to a method for producing spiral welded pipe or tubing. Plaintiffs have now moved for summary judgment upon the basic argument that the issues presented here are ones of law. More particularly, plaintiffs urge that the alleged invention of the Buck patent was anticipated and described in a printed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Vermont Structural Slate Company, Inc. v. Tatko Brothers Slate Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Gillman v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Bridgeport Brass Co. v. Bostwick Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Hamilton Laboratories, Inc. v. MassengillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- The Garrett Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- In re WyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Philips Electronic and Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal and Electronics Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- In re BayerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.