Legal Opinion

Doe ex rel. Smith v. Sobeck

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided April 18, 2013No. Case No. 12-cv-1222-JPG-DGWPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by defendants John Sobeck, Cynthia Broskie and the H Group BBT, Inc. (“the H Group”) (Doc. 15). Jane Doe, by her mother and guardian Sabra Smith (“Sabra”) and by her father Mark Smith, has responded to the motion (Doc. 19), and the defendants have replied to that response (Doc. 23).

*1020I. Standard for Dismissal

When reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the Court accepts as true all allegations in the complaint. Erickson…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fuesting v. Uline, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  2. Thurmon v. Mount Carmel High SchoolDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Brownlee v. Catholic Charities of The Archdiocese of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Chad Feldman and Elizabeth Trost, individually and as parents and next friends of John Doe, a minor v. District 6 Board of Education d/b/a Staunton Community School District 6, Brett Allen, Stephanie Schwappach, and Carrie GriffithDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2026
  5. Jackson v. East Saint Louis Board of Education District 189District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API