Legal Opinion

United States v. Adams

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 16, 2005No. NMCCA 200200722PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DORMAN, Chief Judge:

The appellant was tried before a special court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone. In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was convicted of one specification each of unauthorized absence, terminated by apprehension, and failure to go to his appointed place of duty. Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was also convicted of disobeying a lawful order given by a noncommissioned officer (NCO) to change into a proper uniform. The appellant’s offenses violated Articles 86 and 91, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886 and 891. The adjudged and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. Uriel Lara-VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. HinojosNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API