Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bazinsky v. Kesbec, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1940Published

1DissentCohn, J.

I dissent and vote to affirm the judgment. A suit in equity may be maintained to restrain the violation of a statute enacted for the protection of the public by one who is injured in person or in property by its violation. Plaintiffs proved that they have suffered and will continue to suffer special damages by virtue of the illegal use and operation by defendant of its property. *474In the circumstances, the court properly granted equitable relief enjoining the unlawful acts of defendant. (Ackerman v. True, 175 N. Y. 353; Rice v. Van Vranken, 132 Misc. 82; affd., 225 App. Div. 179; affd., 255 N.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bailer v. RingeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API