Legal Opinion

Norris v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 3, 1929No. 4035PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, District Judge.

Any confusion or uncertainty in this case arises, not so much from difficulty in the legal question before the court, but from the manner in which the question is presented. To make this statement clear: If a demurrer had been filed by defendant to the first count in the indictment, it must necessarily have been overruled. This because the charge of conspiracy between Norris and Kerper to commit an offense against the United States, namely, to unlawfully transport liquors from Philadelphia to New York, was well laid, and a demurrer thereto, which for the purposes of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. HolteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Becher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. Lucadamo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. State v. TeahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. May v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. United States v. De VastoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. United States v. AnthonyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. United States v. FarrarDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API