Legal Opinion

O'DONNELL v. Maves

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1968No. 8181PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFARLAND, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs Donald and Margaret O’Donnell sued defendants Keith and Shirley Maves for injuries received by Mrs. O’Donnell in an automobile accident on October 1, 1960, while she was a passenger in a Pontiac automobile driven by her husband. At the time of the accident, their car was stationary, waiting for a traffic light to turn green, when it was rear-ended by Mr. Maves’ 1955 Chevrolet.

The complaint alleged only general negligence. The answer denied negligence, and pleaded unavoidable accident. A jury returned a verdict for defendants, and plaintiffs have appealed.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Throop v. FE Young and CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Yoo Thun Lim v. CrespinArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. City of Phoenix v. CamfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Pickwick Stages Corp. v. MessingerArizona Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Koll v. Manatt's Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Orlando v. NorthcuttArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Brookover v. Roberts Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Schaub v. LinehanIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API