Legal Opinion

Calladine v. HYSTER COMPANY

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1986No. Docket 83785PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Panzy Calladme, individ ually and as guardian of William Calladine, brought suit in the Wayne Circuit Court against defendants Hyster Company, Hyster Credit Corporation, and Modern Handling Equipment Company. Plaintiff alleged that Modern Handling, as owner of a forklift, was responsible for all injuries resulting from the negligent operation of the forklift and that defendants were liable to them based on defective product design and manufacture. Defendants filed a third-party complaint against Dana Corporation alleging that Dana had agreed to indemnify and hold them harmless from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gartside v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Meadows v. Depco Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Pritts v. J I Case Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Ladner v. Vander BandMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. General Aviation, Inc. v. The Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Triple E Produce Corp. v. Mastronardi Produce, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Zurich Insurance v. CCR & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Mull v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Romska v. OpperMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API