Lutz v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
Attorney General LeRoy S. Zimmerman has filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to James L. Lutz’s complaint in mandamus.1 We sustain the preliminary objections.
The pertinent facts are as follows: Lutz avers that he had been employed as a special investigator by the District Attorney of Schuylkill County and that the •County refused to pay him $3,200 for his services. The District Attorney denied employment.
Lutz informed the Attorney General that the District Attorney had made fraudulent representations to the common pleas court, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. MalloySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. OrsiniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Carino v. Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- United States Ex Rel. Miller v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nader v. HughesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- J. Lichtman v. K. HodgeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- J. Lichtman v. L. KrasnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- J. Lichtman v. L. KrasnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019