Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Brown

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 24, 1940Published

1Opinion of the Court

Bogan, S.

The validity of the provisions of article “ Nineteenth ” of the will here under consideration has been attacked as being violative of section 11 of the Personal Property Law and section 42 of the Beal Property Law, it being the contention of certain of the next of kin who would not otherwise benefit, that the language of the will is susceptible of an interpretation that a single trust only was erected, limited upon three lives, consequently resulting in complete intestacy of the residue.

As to the residue of his estate the testator provided as follows:

“ Nineteenth. All the rest,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kalish v. . KalishNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. In Re the Estate of ColegroveNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. In Re the Accounting of ProssNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Schermerhorn v. . CottingNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. In re the Estate of DrakeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API