Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting of Pross

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1936PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The executors named in the will of Malky Lyons have filed their accounts and have asked for the construction of the residuary clause of that will. The attempted disposition of part of the residuary estate is patently invalid. The problem presented upon this appeal is whether such invalidity results in intestacy as to the entire residuary estate or affects only a portion thereof.

The testatrix at the time of her death had four children and each of these children had living issue. She directed that her residuary estate should be divided into four equal parts, and that one of such parts should be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of DurandNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Kalish v. . KalishNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Benedict v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. In re the Estate of GreenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of LyonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of Van NostrandNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  5. In re the Intermediate Account of RichmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API