In re the Estate of Drake
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The question of testamentary interpretation here propounded relates to the validity under section 42 of the Real Property Law of a direction by the testator relating to the residue of the estate, to “ invest and reinvest the same * * * and * * * to divide the income into three equal parts and to pay said income quarter-yearly to Annie M. Burk * * * to Alfred Winslow Drake * * * and to Chester Alwyn Drake * • * * as long as each shall live. As each of the above-named persons die, I direct that the income of my estate shall be divided among and be paid to the survivor until the last…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re HornidgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- Schermerhorn v. . CottingNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- In re the Estate of WeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of HowellsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of MannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re the Estate of MooresNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of LyonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Construction of the Will of BreckeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- In re the Estate of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of ChapmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.