Legal Opinion

State v. Prabhudail

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 1999No. C2-99-501PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the district court’s continuation for dismissal of a solicitation charge, contending there were no justifying special circumstances. We reverse.

FACTS

The Minneapolis police arrested respondent Bhawesh Prabhudail after he allegedly offered a plain-clothes officer, acting as a prostitution decoy, money for sexual contact. • The state charged Prabhudail with misdemeanor solicitation of prostitution in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.324, subd. 3 (1998). At a pretrial hearing, Prabhudail’s counsel informed the district court that, due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alanis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. ThomaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of J.R.Z.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. State v. HoelzelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State v. StrokCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. State v. HoelzelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API