Legal Opinion

State v. Hoelzel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 2000No. C8-00-851PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge

The district court found appellant Richard A. Hoelzel guilty of felony burglary and gross-misdemeanor interference with a 911 call. The court stayed imposition of sentence on the gross misdemeanor count and refused to sentence on the felony count. The state appeals. Because we conclude that the district court’s refusal to sentence effectively stayed adjudication of the burglary count and that the stay was not supported by “special circumstances,” we reverse and remand for sentencing.

FACTS

In September 1999, respondent Richard A. Hoelzel entered his estranged wife’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. ThomaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. TwissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. PrabhudailCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HoelzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State v. HoelzelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API