Legal Opinion

Rumford Chemical Works v. New York Baking Powder Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 7, 1904No. 172PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This action was commenced in the Southern District of New York for the infringement of letters patent No. 474,811, granted to Charles A. Catlin, assignor to the Rumford Chemical Works, of Providence, R. I., May 17, 1892, for improvements in baking preparations. The Circuit Court (125 Fed. 231) dismissed the bill upon the authority of Glue Co. v. Upton, 97 U. S. 3, 24 L. Ed. 985.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The patent in suit relates to that class of baking preparations in which the active acid agent is, in whole or in part, some form of phosphoric acid or acid phosphate. Broadly stated the invention consists of a baking preparation in which the phosphoric *386acid element is, practically, in a granular condition free from pulverulent phosphatic material. The patentee asserts that this granular material possesses peculiar and distinctive properties and characteristics of great value and is a new product or article of manufacture.

The specification states that baking preparations…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Glue Co. v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Hutter v. De Q. Bottle Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  5. King v. AndersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Rumford Chemical Works v. Hygienic Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Hy-Lo Unit & Metal Products Co. v. Remote Control Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. American Graphophone Co. v. Universal Talking Mach. Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  5. Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. Frank S. De Ronde Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API