Rattan & Cane Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Cross appeals from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36027 (T. D. 34609).
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge
The merchandise involved in this case consists of certain round reeds under 7 millimeters in diameter, also certain slab and broom or split rattan imported under the tariff act of 1909. The appeal originally included certain binding cane known as “D” binding, but that assignment has been formally waived of record in this court.
The merchandise in question was assessed with duty at the rate of 10 per cent ad valorem under the provision for “chair cane or reeds wrought or manufactured from rattans or reeds” contained in paragraph 212 of the act of 1909.
*2The importers protested against tbe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Frazee v. MoffittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1882
- United States v. WinterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Foppes v. MagoneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889
- Foppes v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. LarzelereCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. SteebCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Peabody & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- United States v. Gerdau Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Atkins, Kroll & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.