Legal Opinion

United States v. Ali

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2010No. 07-10529, 07-10539, 07-10542PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

This case arises from a scheme whereby Mirza Ali, Sameena Ali, and Keith Griffen (collectively “Defendants”) purchased Microsoft software at discounted prices then resold the software for a profit. The case calls upon us to interpret and apply the mail and wire fraud statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343. Significantly, we hold Defendants were properly convicted of mail and wire fraud, because (1) a right to payment of money for the sale of software is “money or property” as defined in 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343, and (2) neither statute requires a transfer…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Munoz-CamarenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Juan Quintero-JuncoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Bias v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  5. United States v. Facundo Acosta-ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API