In Re Craven

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This matter has been before us once already. See 169 La. 555,125 So. 591.

At that time we held that under the provisions of article 7, § 10, Const. 1921, all proceedings for the disbarment of attorneys must be had exclusively under rules to be adopted by this court; that the rules then existing provided for no substituted service when the attorney against whom the proceedings were instituted could not be served in person.

Thereafter, to wit, on January 23, 1930…