Legal Opinion

Mondt v. Ehrenwerth

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 21, 1929No. Gen. No. 33,118PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

This is an action on the case for alleged negligence causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate, a boy. five years of age.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the court instructed the jury to return a verdict for defendant, and from the judgment entered on this verdict the plaintiff has appealed. The controlling question in the case is whether the court erred in directing the verdict.

The declaration is in three counts, the first of which is based on the statute, the second on general negligence, and the third on the theory of an attractive nuisance.

The accident in which the intestate lost…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hartnett v. Boston StoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Davidson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Bunyan v. American Glycerin Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  4. Miller v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  5. Anderson v. KarstensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tharp Ex Rel. Tharp v. MonseesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Van Skike v. ZussmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Clark Ex Rel. Clark v. TicehurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API