Marriage of Orman v. Orman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
The father appeals enforcement of an escalator clause for child support payments. He also challenges the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to the mother. The mother cross appeals denial of prejudgment interest on child support arrear-ages arising under the escalator clause. 1 We affirm.
FACTS
Darlene and Timothy Orman’s marriage was dissolved in January 1975. The dissolution decree gave the mother custody of the couple’s four children and ordered the father to pay $700 per month child support. The decree also included the following escalator clause.
As and for additional…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kirby v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Material Movers, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Orman v. OrmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holiday Recreational Industries, Inc. v. Manheim Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Hutchinson Utilities Commission Of The City Of Hutchinson v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Marriage of Redmond v. RedmondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Hutchinson Utilities Commission of Hutchinson v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Marriage of Zickefoose v. MunteanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987