Legal Opinion

Marriage of Redmond v. Redmond

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1999No. C2-98-1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant Thomas Redmond seeks review of the district court’s denial of his motion for modification of a marital property settlement and its acceleration of payment of a deferred settlement, with interest until final payment is made. We affirm and also order Redmond to pay attorney fees to respondent Michelle Vlahos (formerly Redmond), pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 518.14, subd. 1 (1998).

FACTS

The parties’ marriage was dissolved on February 19, 1993, following a six-day trial at which the primary issue was the identification and division of marital property. The largest item…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Marriage of Orman v. OrmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Bakken v. HelgesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API