Legal Opinion

Hearn v. Schendel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1959No. Docket 69, Calendar 47,333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

This is a suit for personal injuries and .compensatory damages* suffered on account of ¡claimed negligence of the defendants; such negli*650gence consisting essentially of alleged misconstruction—in violation of original plans and specifications—of the canopy over a student walkway attached to and constituting a part of the Hale-school, in the town of Riverview. Plaintiff James M. Hearn was employed to demolish a part of the-canopy and, while so engaged, was injured by collapse of a portion of the under part of the canopy roof. The result below was a directed verdict for all of the defendants.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greenough v. GreenoughMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Miller v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wilks v. KempfMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. In Re Schantz EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schell v. Baker Furniture Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Rockwell v. VandenboschMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Hearn v. SchendelMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API