Legal Opinion

In Re Schantz Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1958No. Docket 58, Calendar 47,755PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We said, in Miller v. Allen, 352 Mich 95, 96:

“Counsel must be advised that additional burdens have been voluntarily assumed by this Court through promulgation of the recently adopted appellate rules (effective January, 2, 1957.347 Mich xiv through xxxii). A comprehensive and fully informative appendix, supplied according to the optional provisions of said Rule No 67, is imperatively required under the new appellate practice.”

Here again the appellant’s brief and appendix disregards in substantial entirety the needful and later considered (see Wilks v. Kempf, 352 Mich 445, 451, 452)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Wilks v. KempfMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hearn v. SchendelMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Donovan v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hearn v. SchendelMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API