Legal Opinion
Strand v. Special School District No. 1
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 11, 1985No. C4-84-1466PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellants appeal the Minneapolis School Board’s decision to terminate their employment. Appellant Strand contends the Board should have reassigned a more senior teacher in order to preserve her seniority rights. Appellant Johnson claims her termination was improper because another more senior teacher in her department continued to be employed past the age of mandatory retirement. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
The facts of this matter are not disputed. Appellants’ employment with the Minneapolis School District was terminated on July 17, 1984. The terminations were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McSherry v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Welsko v. Foster Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Berland v. Special School District No. 1, MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Steele v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Strand v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Beste v. Independent School District No. 697Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Sweeney v. Special School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Brandhorst v. Special School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.