Legal Opinion
Sweeney v. Special School District No. 1
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 21, 1985No. C2-84-1689PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Special School District No. 1 appeals the trial court’s ruling that it is enjoined from demoting respondents pending notice and hearing. The school district also appeals the award to respondents of back pay and reasonable attorney fees. Affirmed in part and remanded.
FACTS
The five respondents are employed by appellant Special School District No. 1. Each had been employed by the District for at least fifteen years before the 1981-82 school year and each held the position of principal or assistant principal in 1981-82.
Effective August 1982, pursuant to Board action of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Murray v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marx v. Truck Renting & Leasing Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Evans v. Independent School District No. 281Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Washington v. Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Murphy v. St. Paul Public Schools, Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011