Van Pelt v. Bertilrud
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Roseau county to permanently enjoin the auditor of that county and the members of the county board from proceeding further in the matter of a certain bond issue and from signing, executing or delivering the bonds of the county. Prom an order, Grindeland, J., sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to restrain the auditor and board of county commissioners of Roseau county from issuing and negotiating bonds under the provisions of section 18, c. 230, p. 322, Laws 1905 [R. L. Supp. 1909, § 2651 — 61], in such form as to create a direct obligation of the county. A demurrer to the complaint being sustained, plaintiff appeals.
*51From the complaint it appears that pursuant to the provisions of the drainage statute a ditch was duly established in the county, the contract for its construction duly let, and a large part thereof completed by the contractor; that on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Lien v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Fowler v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Schenck v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Maltby v. TautgesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sebern v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- State ex rel. Arpin v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Alexander v. McInnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State ex rel. County of Murray v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Lyman v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.