United States v. $122,640.00 in U.S. Currency
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES K BREDAR, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Government’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of Claimant Samantha Banks’s standing to challenge the forfeiture of the Defendant currency. (ECF Nos. 34, 38.) The Court has considered it, Claimant’s response (ECF No. 43), and the reply (ECF No. 48). No hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2014). The motion will be granted.
I. Standard for Summary Judgment
“The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. $200,000 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- United States v. $16,761 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
- United States v. Approximately $252,140.00 in US CurrencyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- United States v. Approximately $90,050 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022