Legal Opinion

United States v. $200,000 in U.S. Currency

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided September 28, 2016No. 1:14-cv-836PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge

The United States of America (“Plaintiff’ or the “Government”) initiated this in rem civil forfeiture proceeding on September 30, 2014, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) for the forfeiture of $200,000 in U.S. Currency (“Defendant Currency”). (Compl. at 1, ECF No. 1.) On January 6, 2015, Damian Phillips filed a Verified Claim to Defendant Currency, (Claim, ECF No. 7), and an Answer to the Complaint (Answer, ECF No. 8). Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on March 4, 2016,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Rossignol v. VoorhaarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pooler v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  2. United States v. $44,379.00 IN U.S. CURRENCYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
  3. United States v. 14K Miami Cuban Chain, VL: $23,000.00District Court, N.D. New York · 2023
  4. United States v. Approximately $13,205.54 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API