Legal Opinion

Jacobson v.Van Boening

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1896No. 6441PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court of Adams county. Heard below before Beall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Is VINE, C.

Tbis was an action by tbe appellee against tbe appellant for tbe purpose of obtaining an injunction restraining tbe appellant from maintaining a certain ditcb wliereby it was alleged that waters collected upon tbe lands of appellant were discharged upon tbe lands of plaintiff, to plaintiff’s damage. Tbe evidence is hopelessly conflicting, and in some parts very obscure. As there was a general finding for tbe plaintiff, we must take it in tbe light in which it most strongly tends to support tbe allegations of tbe petition. So considered, it appears that tbe parties are owners of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. MarleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Morrissey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Davis v. LondgreenNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Lincoln & Black Hills Railroad v. SutherlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Todd v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Snyder v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. HarlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Town v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Churchill v. BeetheNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API