Legal Opinion
People v. Bradshaw
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 9, 2007No. 06SA366PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
The People bring this interlocutory appeal pursuant to CAR. 4.1 and section 16-12, 102(2), C.R.S. (2006), to reverse a trial court ruling suppressing statements and physical evidence obtained during the custodial interrogation of defendant, Brandon J. Bradshaw ("Bradshaw"). The trial court's ruling to suppress statements was based on its finding that the interviewing officer violated Bradshaw's Miranda rights by failing to cease the interrogation when Bradshaw requested an attorney. The trial court further suppressed evidence from swabs of Bradshaw's mouth as fruit of the poisonous tree.
*454Becaus…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. RedgebolSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- People v. MarkoColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- People v. LynnSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.