Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 21, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Nelson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hannah

Affirming.

On October 18, 1910, the Puritan Manufacturing Company of Iowa City, Iowa, sold to E. M. Ford, a merchant of New Haven, Kentucky, a quantity of jewelry and a popularity contest outfit, for which Ford executed to the company his note in the sum of five hundred dollars, payable in installments of one hundred and twenty-five dollars, due in three, four, six and eight months respectively from the date thereof. Ford paid the first one hundred and twenty-five dollars, but declined to pay the balance, whereupon C. W. Harrison, of Iowa *468City, Iowa,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Postal Telg. Cable Co. v. Louisville Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. New York Life Ins. v. Brown's AdmrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  3. Lou. & Nash. R. R. v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anglo-American Mill Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Rist v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Cumberland Bank & Trust Co. v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Harrison v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Grimes v. LangevinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API