Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Perry

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 13, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

Appellee entered into a contract -with the Lyon-Taylor Company (hereinafter referred to as the company)., January 28, 1914, by the terms of which he promised to. pay to said company the sum of twelve hundred dollars, for three pianos, and other articles incident to the conduct of a popularity contest. Finding he had overreached himself in the making of the contract, appellee notified the company of this fact, and • as a result of certain correspondence between them a contract of a similar nature,, but for a smaller amount, was entered into, the cash…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commercial Security Co. v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Harrison v. Pearcy & ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Johnson's Administrator v. Commissioners of SewerageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. American Manufacturing Co. v. Crittenden Record-PressCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Gardner v. Commercial Security Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Logan v. Amos'Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API