Legal Opinion
At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided August 31, 1999No. 97-1573-CV-W-5, 97-4337-CV-W-5, 98-0540-CV-W-5, 98-0501-CV-W-5PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART AND REMANDING IN PART THE ORDERS OF THE MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
LAUGHREY, District Judge.
These consolidated cases come to this Court for judicial review of an administra-five order entered by the Missouri Public Service Commission (“PSC”) pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“the Act,” “the Telecommunications Act”), Pub.L. Í04-104, 110 Stat. 56 (codified at various sections of 47 U.S.C.). 1 The Telecommunications Act ended the era of monopoly-based Ideal telephone service by eliminating legal barriers to competition and by requiring local telephone…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. AppleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. New York Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- U S West Communications, Inc. v. HixDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Laurence Wolf Capital Management Trust v. City of FerndaleDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.