Brehm v. Sargent & Lundy
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti
The sole issue in this case is whether an employee’s suit for a declaratory judgment that he is entitled to a pension, filed 13/2 years after retirement, is barred by the statute of limitations. We hold that it is and affirm the trial court’s granting of summary judgment for the defendant.
The relevant facts in this case, as revealed by the pleadings and affidavits, are few. The plaintiff retired from the defendant’s employment on December 31, 1962. The defendant provides a pension plan for those employees who have worked for the company for 15 years. Whether the plaintiff met this requirement…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Halberstadt v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Light v. LightIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. NicolettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- James F. Jenkins v. Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Beynon Building Corp. v. National Guardian Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Thread & Gage Co., Inc. v. KucinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Frederickson v. BlumenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Luminall Paints, Inc. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.