Legal Opinion

People v. Nicoletti

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1974PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.

Over objection, recorded telephone conversations intercepted pursuant to an eavesdropping warrant, were introduced into evidence at defendants’ joint trial for conspiracy (Penal Law, § 105.00) and promoting gambling (Penal Law, § 225.05). On these appeals from orders of the Appellate Division affirming their convictions, the determinative issue is whether the absence of seals on the recordings was sufficiently explained to justify their admission into evidence.

We reverse and hold, as a matter of law, that the absence of seals was insufficiently explained and that the recordings were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. Eduardo PoetaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. KohneDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Poeta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. KohneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. BasilicatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. People v. GoldfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API