Legal Opinion
Mord v. New York Indemnity Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 19, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, P. J.
We are of opinion that the books and accounts kept by the assured, the Star Fur Dressers Company, the plaintiff’s assignor, complied with the provisions of the policy. As indicated by its name, the assured was not the owner of the stolen skins. These skins were delivered to the assured by the owners and taken to the fur dressing factory in Greenpoint where they were treated by the assured and then returned to the owners. The Fur Dressers Company kept books showing the dat.e of receipt of the skins, the number and description of the skins received, and the name and address of the owner. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stillwell v. . StaplesNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Garten v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Lenzner v. National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by12 opinions
- The Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd. v. William Gluckin & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Licht v. New York Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- CBF Trading Co., Inc. v. Hanover Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Stewart v. American Home Fire Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Ever Krisp Food Products Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.