Legal Opinion
Lenzner v. National Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 23, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, J.:
Defendant issued a policy of burglary insurance covering plaintiff’s stock of furs at No. 617 Nostrand avenue, Brooklyn, and, while the policy was still in force, plaintiff’s premises were burglariously entered and a considerable quantity of merchandise stolen and taken away. The policy of insurance provides among other things:
“ In Consideration of the reduced rate at which this policy is written, it is understood and agreed that the assured carries a policy of $4,000 in the New Amsterdam; also an excess policy of $6,000 in the Hartford Accident and Indemnity. This policy No. 787709…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pearlman v. Metropolitan Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mord v. New York Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Globe Jewelry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
- 6247 Atlas Corp. v. Marine Ins. Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Globe Jewelry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973