Legal Opinion

Lenzner v. National Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, J.:

Defendant issued a policy of burglary insurance covering plaintiff’s stock of furs at No. 617 Nostrand avenue, Brooklyn, and, while the policy was still in force, plaintiff’s premises were burglariously entered and a considerable quantity of merchandise stolen and taken away. The policy of insurance provides among other things:

“ In Consideration of the reduced rate at which this policy is written, it is understood and agreed that the assured carries a policy of $4,000 in the New Amsterdam; also an excess policy of $6,000 in the Hartford Accident and Indemnity. This policy No. 787709…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mord v. New York Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Globe Jewelry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
  3. 6247 Atlas Corp. v. Marine Ins. Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Globe Jewelry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API