Legal Opinion
Licht v. New York Indemnity Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff, a dealer in furs, procured from the defendant a $10,000 policy upon the furs, insuring the plaintiff against- a loss thereof through burglary. He asserts that about six months later his shop was entered by burglars and furs of a value exceeding $17,000 were removed therefrom.
The policy provided “ that the company shall not be liable * * * unless books and accounts are kept by the assured and are kept in such manner so that the exact amount of the loss can be accurately determined therefrom by the company.” The defendant asserted that the provisions of the policy in reference to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mord v. New York Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Mord v. New York Indemnity CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atlantic Fruit Co. v. Hamilton Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Globe Jewelry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
- Stewart v. American Home Fire Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- 6247 Atlas Corp. v. Marine Ins. Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Eurospark Industries, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to the Risk on Cover No. 97FA0071010ADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.