Legal Opinion

State v. Irick

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1995PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, the issue presented is whether the Court of Criminal Appeals correctly denied the defendant’s request for a writ of mandamus to require the trial court to conduct a sentencing hearing. Because, in this case, issuance of the writ of mandamus is not necessary to aid the exercise of the appellate function of the Court of Criminal Appeals, we affirm the denial of the writ.

BACKGROUND

The defendant, Larry Irick, pleaded guilty to three counts of vehicular homicide and two counts of vehicular assault. Irick received a six-year sentence in the Department…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barger v. BrockTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. IrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  3. Peerless Construction Co. v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State v. DoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  2. State of Tennessee v. Richard Odom, a/k/a Otis SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Weston v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API