Legal Opinion
Barger v. Brock
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1976PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FONES, Chief Justice.
This action involves the right or power of the Chancery Court to declare a Rule of the Supreme Court to be violative of the Constitution of Tennessee and enjoin its enforcement.
The plaintiffs, Al S. Barger, Leon W. Davis, Jr., U. L. McDonald, Joe M. Parker and Richard H. Winningham are practicing attorneys in Chattanooga, Hamilton County, Tennessee and are solicitors and officers of this Court.
The defendants, Ray L. Brock, Jr., Robert E. Cooper, William H. D. Fones, William J. Harbison and Joseph W. Henry, constitute the Supreme Court of Tennessee and are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Bloodworth v. Stuart Ex Rel. StuartTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Chumbley v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- Hurt v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- State v. PendergrassCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- The State Bar of Texas v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BradenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- William H. Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Derrick Brandon Bush v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.