Legal Opinion
State v. Sneed
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1900PublishedCited by 13 opinions
.FROM KNOX. Application for mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.
Upon a former day of tlie present term of this Court an application for mandamus was disposed of, and a written memorandum was handed down showing the grounds of the ■ Court’s action. This memorandum is in the words and figures following:
*713“State, ex rd. John Richards, I Law Docket Knox J os. V Sneed. J 0omly-
“This is an application for mandamus against the Hon. Jos. W. Sneed, Judge of the Circuit Court in and for Knox County.
“Its prayer is to require him to expunge from the minutes of the Court over which he presides an entry of judgment for $65 and costs in the cause of Horn v. Richards, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gould v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Noyes & Pettingill v. HewittNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Ex Parte JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Vanvabry v. StatonTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- People Ex Rel. Freer v. . Canal AppraisersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peerless Construction Co. v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. IrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Burg v. Milwaukee Medical CollegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Pierce v. TharpTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.